More corrections and clarifications.
Coming Next:
I have (consistent?) stories to tell about:
Speaking rationally and acting rationally.
Thought.
The form of a 'complete' explanation or argument, and the (only partly surmountable) barriers to constructing these. And more on why we can't always say why they fail.
Issues with 'absolute truths': statements about what must be true which are not 'boundary' statements (about the possibility of the game). These appear in religious dogma, but also in epistemological dogma.
I think they are statements about how to think rather than about the limitations of talk. They break the rule about ambiguous behavioural attribution of intentionality.
No comments:
Post a Comment