A scientific theory need only be presently intelligible - 'unfalsified', in traditional terminology. This can mean that, given other hypotheses, its contrary is unintelligible.
The contrary of an epistemological theory needs to be unintelligible tout court.
If it isn't, then the theory is hostage to any hypothesis on which its contrary's unintelligibility depends. More open questions ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment